Women on the Front Line – Stories of Delaware Suffragists

I recently did a Delaware Humanities sponsored talk on Women’s Suffrage at the New Castle Courthouse Museum.   In that ancient courtroom, a large, engaged crowd gathered on a Sunday afternoon to reflect on the long struggle for women’s suffrage in America.  For some eighty years, the ladies petitioned, campaigned, marched, and protested as they fought to convince men that they should have equal access to the ballot box. It is important to remember their stories, struggles, and sacrifices as they fought for equality.

Delaware Suffragettes
Catherine Boyle, a Delaware Suffragist, was arrested in Washington, D.C.. (Source Library of Congress https://www.loc.gov/resource/mnwp.148010/)

During one segment, we talked about the role of Delaware women, prominent and every day, in making a difference for the movement.  Frequently, many of these underrepresented experiences have been left out of the narrative so I weave some of those struggles into the accounts, especially those of people on the front line. 

While discussing the role of Delaware suffragists in the movement, a gentleman sitting on one of the court benches in the back of the room joined the conversation, remarking that the photo on the screen was his grandmother, Catherine Boyle, a munitions worker from New Castle during World War I.  She was arrested for watchfires in January 1919.  Given the choice of a fine or jail time for starting what the metropolitan police called “large bonfires,” Mrs. Boyle decided that she would rather be incarcerated.

Earlier, during a suffrage demonstration in Lafayette Square across from the White House, sixty members of the National Woman’s Party were arrested on Aug. 7, 1918. These detainees included Mrs. Boyle and nine other protestors from the First State (Evening Journal Aug. 7, 1918). Major Raymond Pullman, chief of police in the District, said that in addition those “bearers of the most prominent banner in the demonstration would be held under the espionage act.” The banner said, “We protest against continued disenfranchisement of American women for which the President of the United States is responsible.”

Another time, twenty-two militant suffragists went on a hunger strike in the prison, charged with lighting fires on government property. They also burned copies of President Wilson’s speeches in Europe in a watchfire of freedom before the White House. This they said was in protest for his failure to force through the suffrage amendment in the Senate. Among this group were Mrs. Catherine Boyle of New Castle, Mrs. Lawrence Barrett, and Mrs. Mary E. Brown of Wilmington, DE,” the Evening Journal reported on Jan. 18, 1919.

Before we moved on in the program, Mike McCaffery, the relative, shared a little more about the experiences of the advocate for women, family accounts that have been handed down through the generations.

Several other Delaware suffragists were arrested in the District of Columbia for believing that women’s voices were as important as any and needed to be heard.  Ms. Arnel told the Sunday Star, a Wilmington newspaper, “We were good enough to work in the steel plant and help load shells for the battle-fields of France, but we are still not good enough to vote, it seems. Can anyone see justice in this?”

While locked up, the women went on hunger strikes, eating nothing while doing time. When they were released in January 1919, the Evening Journal remarked: “They looked none the worse for their experience, but proud that they had been imprisoned for the cause of political freedom for women (Jan. 22, 1919).”

These ladies all wore the “prison pin,” a miniature replica of a cell door in the Occoquan Workhouse, where the suffragists had been imprisoned. The pins showed “the bars and lock, and the place through which soup and wormy bread” was passed to them. At least ten women from the State were entitled to wear the “prison gate” gold pin for equal suffrage from the Woman’s National Party.

Delaware Suffragist Released (Evening Journal, Jan. 18, 1919)

Delaware ladies were deeply involved in the protests in the District of Columbia.  They marched in the streets and were heckled, and these silent sentinels stood guard at the White House, ensuring the nation and President Woodrow Wilson heard their message.  And they tended the watchfires burning on Pennsylvania Avenue as the long campaign was pushed to victory.  Often they were arrested for simply assembling and marching as they challenged those that believed that women did not need to vote as husbands, the heads of the household, represented the family at the polls.

The suffragists of Delaware were an instrumental part of the suffrage movement, and although it had been a long road to the polls, it finally happened in 1920 when the 19th amendment was passed, allowing women to enter the voting booth for the first time.

Delaware Suffragists
Mike McCaffery, the grandson of Delaware Suffragist Catherine Boyle holds a photo of his grandmother. Thanks, Mr. McCaffery for sharing your stories with us.

Women’s Suffrage in Maryland

See Also

Delaware Suffragists protested at the White House.
Members of the NWP demonstrate in front of the White House while maintaining the watchfire. Jan. 1919 (Source: Library of Congress https://www.loc.gov/resource/mnwp.276030/)

Joining the NEH Assessment Team in Indiana

While I was in Indiana as part of an assessment team for the National Endowment for the Humanities, I had a chance to meet with the talented Hoosiers who bring innovative humanities programs to the State. This is a tweet for the NEH Fed/State Twitter Feed.

The Chesapeake & Delaware Canal on MPT

For Chesapeake Bay Week 2019, Maryland Public Television (MPT) aired a special on the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal. The special aired on April 22 at 9 p.m. I was pleased to have the opportunity to assist MPT with this project by providing research assistance as the documentary crew planned the production.

Here is the MPT preview about “The little-known but fascinating story of the C & D Canal, a critically-important 14-mile long trade route used extensively by international shipping. It’s called “Baltimore’s back door” because it’s a money-saving shortcut between the port of Baltimore and points north via the Atlantic Ocean.”

Here is the link to the full C & D Canal Show on MPT

See Also

bethel cemetery on the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal
At Bethel Cemetery alongside the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal.

The C & D Canal During the Civil War – A Talk at New Castle Public Library

When the Sheriff was the Hangman

A LECTURE — For the Hereditary Order of the Signers of the Bush Declaration, I was recently asked to examine the era in our criminal justice system when the sheriff was the county executioner or hangman. This gruesome responsibility was eventually centralized in the state prison systems, but the duty remained in the hands of local lawmen until the 20th century.

the sheriff was the hangman.  A photograph of the Franklin County PA Prison and Gallows
A program about the time when the sheriff was the hangman or executioner

In 1906, the State of New Jersey took on the responsibility for executing the condemned, while Maryland took similar action in 1922. I drew on archival and fieldwork involved with examining crime and punishment in the 18th, 19th and early 20th century, for the lecture. This included working with long unexamined coroner’s inquests, court proceeding — death warrants, pleas, motions, and trial transcripts — dockets, and police blotters to develop an understanding of how local law enforcement carried out the grim task for centuries.

The sheriff was the hangman when they executed John Brown in Hagerstown on June 30, 1916. (Photo Credit: Postcard Courtesy of the Western Maryland Room at the Washington County Free Library).

For more on when the sheriff was the Executioner

When the Sheriff was the Hangman — more information oh these and other photos related to this era.

Photographing an Execution